When Young Entrepreneurs Hosted Africa’s Richest Man, Aliko Dangote

Dangote

Africa’s richest man and business mogul, Aliko Dangote was recently hosted to a roundtable talk by young African entrepreneurs in Lagos in the last episode of MTV Base Meets with... MTN. MTV is an American music television channel transmitting from New York, United States.

Dangote was recently named by United States’ Forbes Magazine as the richest man in Africa and the 51st richest person in the world with a net worth of $13.8 billion.

At the programme, the 54-year-old business magnate told the young entrepreneurs about the secret of success, beginning with his humble beginning in 1977.

He made them know that all was not well from the onset – that it was not a bed of roses. He had to secure a loan from his rich uncle and what he sowed then with that little amount has now grown to become Africa’s largest business conglomerate – Dangote Group.

Dangote, though started small, but now controls a business empire which boasts 12,000 employees. His business initiatives cover cement production, sugar manufacturing and transportation services, while he also has interest in oil and gas, banking, textiles and real estate.

Among the four young entrepreneurs Dangote, spoke with at Eko Hotel, Lagos, venue of the programme, is an investment banker, a Nigerian and Masters in Business Administration (MBA) student, J.G. Ayodele.

Others with him are Zimbabwean-born United States-based public administration and master’s degree student, Farayi Chipungu; a photographer, Yomi Black; another Nigerian and a Liberian singer, Jerrilyn.

On every episode of MTV Base Meets…with MTN, African youths were given the opportunity to meet, speak with and ask questions from Africa’s political, cultural and business leaders.

In the last editions of the programme, successful personalities in the world, among which are the music legend, Hugh Masekela; United Kingdom’s businessman, Richard Branson; Nigerian media guru, Ben Murray Bruce; South African politician, Julius Malema; Liberia’s president and a Nobel prize winner, who is the first and only Africa’s female president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and Rwandan president, Paul Kagame had at a time been interviewed by Africa’s young entrepreneurs.

Forbes Magazine had said that “the Nigerian businessman’s fortune surged 557 per cent in the past year, making him the world’s biggest gainer in percentage terms and Africa’s richest individual for the first time.

(A).Farayi , (B). Yomi , (c). Ayodele , (D). Jerrilyn

“The catalyst was listing Dangote Cement, which integrated his investments across Africa with his previously public Benue Cement; it now accounts for a quarter of the Nigeria Stock Exchange’s total market cap.

“Already the continent’s biggest cement maker, he has plants under construction in Zambia, Tanzania, Congo and Ethiopia and is building cement terminals in Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast and Liberia, among other places.

“Dangote, who recently bought himself a $45 million Bombardier aircraft for his birthday, has been shuttling back and forth to London for months, in anticipation of a public offering there later this year.

“Dangote began his career as a commodities trader; built his Dangote Group into a conglomerate with interests in sugar, flour milling, salt processing, cement manufacturing, textiles, real estate, and oil and gas.”

Dangote, one good take

E-mailPrintPDF

President Goodluck Jonathan was battling to justify his conferment of the second highest national honour of Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON) on Alhaji Aliko Dangote. The presidential explanation came in the wake of criticisms to the effect that such exalted medal is reserved exclusively for the vice president, Senate president or any eminent public office holder. For the avoidance of doubt, there is no such ‘creed’ making the GCON the exclusive preserve of certain office holders. Since 1964 when the National Honours Act made national honours a nationally recognised reward instrument, over half a century Nigerians who were neither vice presidents nor presidents of the Senate had been honoured with the GCON medal.

It was not therefore out of place for the president to honour Dangote with such exalted diadem. If anything, it was good he did. The argument ought to have been whether we should continue to honour more public office holders than those who have excelled in the private sector. Again, should we continue to hold the national honours ceremony annually or should we re-work the Act to make it biennially or once in four years?

And this is the context in which this year’s National Honours list is a cut above the ones of the previous years: its heavy content of private sector icons including members of the sports and Nollywood enterprise.

In fact, the problem with national honour is the perception that it was nothing but a cheap reward system for indolent and often incompetent public office holders. Non-recognition of private sector whizkids and geniuses has over time robbed the ceremony of its lustre. All over the world, the common denominator among advanced nations is the useful synergy that exists between the government and the private sector. No responsible government in the Western world would ignore its private sector. Indeed, the trend is for major players in the private sector to be treated as special citizens; with utmost courtesy, care and comfort. At all times, the government seeks their opinion on major socio-economic issues.

The reason is simple. It is these private sector maestros that create jobs and have the capacity to create more. In some cases, governments make commitment to these companies just to keep them going. When Bill Clinton was president of the United States and the fortunes of US aircraft manufacturers, McDonnell Douglas and Boeing were going down, it took the marketing skills of Clinton to convince the Saudi government to place orders for more aircraft in a deal worth $6 billion. That was in August 1993. Clinton as president had no stake in Boeing or Mc Donnell Douglas, he was only trying to keep those companies afloat just so their employees can keep their jobs and for more hands to be employed. It is called presidential encouragement (patronage).

In February this year when President Barack Obama was going all grey because of the dire job situation in the US , it was to the private sector icons that he looked. In a bid to sell his ‘win the future’ proposal, he met with the top cats of the Silicon Valley over dinner. But the meeting did not hold in the White House. Yes, the dinner held in the palatial home of John Doerr, a partner at the major Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. There were 12 Silicon Valley CEOs in the room including Mark Zukerberg of Facebook, the late Steve Jobs of Apple, Oracle founder and CEO Larry Ellison, Reed Hasting of Netfix and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.

Obama wants to ‘win the future’ for America . He wants to drape America with high-speed wireless internet. In fact, he wants America to out-innovate the rest of the world through very ambitious funding of research and development all of which will translate to job creation. He could have invited the Silicon Valley magnates to the White House but never, he went ‘chasing’ after them. He wanted to honour them because they count. This happens in the West every time. Responsible governments work hard to protect private sector icons. They treasure them, honour them and never cease to let them know they are highly appreciated.

This is the context the honour conferred on Dangote and other private sector recipients, particularly the entrepreneurs, should be seen as well thought out. Nigeria is perennially classified as one of the most difficult countries to do business. For someone to have grown a business from a mere start-up to a conglomerate employing over 12,000 workers and creating unquantifiable economies of scale on the same turf deserves both adulation and national recognition.

The president was spot on when he said “those who by their innate abilities and creative energies have been able to make impact in our society even deserve more honour than those of us holding political offices. So, we would continue to encourage enterprise, creativity and Nigerians who have excelled in whatever form”. This should be the spirit. National honours should be for those who used their creative abilities, talent and skill to better the lot of humanity and not necessarily for those who by virtue of the public office they hold, are presumed to be working for the good of society. Sir Alex Ferguson of Manchester United and David Beckham were not honoured by the Queen of England because they functioned in 10 Downing Street or the House of Lords. They were honoured because they deployed their skills and creative energies in soccer artistry and management for the good of English football.

The Nigerian award should be such that rewards more Dangotes, Tony Elumelus, Leo Stan Ekehs, Jim Ovias, outstanding academicians, writers, scientists and artisans. It is for men and women of rare heroics. And why, for instance, have we not honoured teenage brave-heart Detimbir Chia? Chia was the 14-year-old lad who in 2006 rallied his friends and community to rescue survivors of a military plane that crashed on Ngokugh Hill in Benue State . Chia, now 19, a first hand witness of the crash, did not only report the incident to his community folk, he was one of the five boys who climbed the hill to rescue the survivors. Such heroic deserves a national garland.

As for Dangote, it was a damn good thing that the president honoured a Nigerian whose business acumen has thrust him as a veritable test case for the best Business schools. It was good we honoured our own who is today the richest black man (worth over $13.8 billion according to Forbes) on earth before others do it for us. My take: Dangote deserves his trophy.

DR. ALIKO DANGOTE: AFRIPOL PERSON OF THE WEEK

by Afripol November 23, 2011



http://afripol.org/afripol/item/411-aliko-dangote-afripol-person-of-the-week.html


Aliko Dangote is the brainy Nigerian based entrepreneur, the founder, CEO and president of Dangote Group. He is an industrialist, a manufacturer of commodities principally food and cement. The head office of Dangote Group is in Lagos, Nigeria but company's prowess is felt across Africa and beyond. Dangote can be described as the King of cement industry due to his vast, enormous and extensive investment in cement manufacturing throughout Africa.


No other Nigerian has done more than Alhaji Aliko Dangote for entrenchment, consolidation and promotion of capitalism, market economy and free enterprise particularly in Nigeria and Africa in general. With his industry, business acumen and dedication comes a great dividend and returns that has made Dangote the richest man in Nigeria and Africa. The world renowned capitalistic magazine Forbes has quantified his personal wealth at a tune of $10.1 billion and that is not bad at all for a person who started a business from a loan he got from an uncle. For his vanguard in business and investment in Nigeria, President Goodluck Jonathan awarded him Grand Commander Order of Niger,GCON, which he richly deserved and merit.
Forbes wrote that the "Nigerian commodities titan Aliko Dangote is also Africa's cement king. In late 2010, he listed Dangote Cement on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The company integrated Dangote's cement investments across Africa, including Benue Cement, formerly listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. It's now the largest company on the Nigerian exchange, with a market capitalization of $10 billion. In August, Dangote received approval from the Central Bank of Nigeria to invest $4 billion to build a new cement facility in the Ivory Coast. He's also building a $115 million cement plant in Cameroon, and owns plants in Zambia, Senegal, Tanzania and South Africa, among others. Dangote started trading commodities more than three decades ago after receiving a business loan from his uncle. He then built the Dangote Group - a leading West African conglomerate with interests in cement manufacturing, sugar refineries, flour milling and salt processing. Venerable philanthropist has given away millions to education, health and social causes."
The great thing about Aliko Dangote is his commitment to Nigeria and Africa. Most of his investments are in Africa and with that he has shown that Nigeria and other African countries can be lucrative for investments due to large returns from them. Dangote is the largest private employer of labour in the continent and jobs given has aided to slow down rampant unemployment facing Nigeria and Africa. This has given hope to the youths and has sown the seed of fruitfulness in the emerging economies of Nigeria, Senegal, Zambia and many others in Africa. Dangote can now become a tril blazer, a role model to aspiring business executive and many rich Africans that they can invest in Africa's market. Dangote is the greatest rebranding that Nigeria needs because he has shown to the whole world by his handwork and patriotism that Nigeria and indeed Africa are ready for 21st century, that a century of innovations and possibilities can be spearhead by Nigerians and Africans.
For his unflinching patriotism, business commitment and investment in today and tomorrow’s Africa's, the board and staff of Afripol Organization chose the business giant and magnate ALIKO DANGOTE AS THE PERSON OF THE WEEK.
Africa Political and Economic Strategic Center (Afripol) is foremost a public policy center whose fundamental objective is to broaden the parameters of public policy debates in Africa. To advocate, promote and encourage free enterprise, democracy, sustainable green environment, human rights, conflict resolutions, transparency and probity in Africa. http://afripol.org/ strategist@afripol.org

The sun shines bright The continent’s impressive growth looks likely to continue

Africa’s hopeful economies


HER $3 billion fortune makes Oprah Winfrey the wealthiest black person in America, a position she has held for years. But she is no longer the richest black person in the world. That honour now goes to Aliko Dangote, the Nigerian cement king. Critics grumble that he is too close to the country’s soiled political class. Nonetheless his $10 billion fortune is money earned, not expropriated. The Dangote Group started as a small trading outfit in 1977. It has become a pan-African conglomerate with interests in sugar and logistics, as well as construction, and it is a real business, not a kleptocratic sham.

Legitimately self-made African billionaires are harbingers of hope. Though few in number, they are growing more common. They exemplify how far Africa has come and give reason to believe that its recent high growth rates may continue. The politics of the continent’s Mediterranean shore may have dominated headlines this year, but the new boom south of the Sahara will affect more lives.

From Ghana in the west to Mozambique in the south, Africa’s economies are consistently growing faster than those of almost any other region of the world. At least a dozen have expanded by more than 6% a year for six or more years. Ethiopia will grow by 7.5% this year, without a drop of oil to export. Once a byword for famine, it is now the world’s tenth-largest producer of livestock. Nor is its wealth monopolised by a well-connected clique. Embezzlement is still common but income distribution has improved in the past decade.

Severe income disparities persist through much of the continent; but a genuine middle class is emerging. According to Standard Bank, which operates throughout Africa, 60m African households have annual incomes greater than $3,000 at market exchange rates. By 2015, that number is expected to reach 100m—almost the same as in India now. These households belong to what might be called the consumer class. In total, 300m Africans earn more than $700 a year. That’s not much, and many of those people could be pushed back into penury by a small change in circumstance. But it can cover a phone and even some school fees. “They are not all middle class by Western standards, but nonetheless represent a vast market,” says Edward George, an economist at Ecobank, another African banking group.

As for Africans below the poverty line—the majority of the continent’s billion people—disease and hunger are still a big problem. Out of 1,000 children 118 will die before their fifth birthday. Two decades ago the figure was 165. Such progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, a series of poverty-reduction milestones set by the UN, is slow and uneven. But it is not negligible. And the mood among have-nots is better than at any time since the independence era two generations ago. True, Africans have a remarkable capacity for being upbeat. But it is seems that this time they really do have something to smile about.

Lions and tigers (and bears)

Since The Economist regrettably labelled Africa “the hopeless continent” a decade ago, a profound change has taken hold. Labour productivity has been rising. It is now growing by, on average, 2.7% a year. Trade between Africa and the rest of the world has increased by 200% since 2000. Inflation dropped from 22% in the 1990s to 8% in the past decade. Foreign debts declined by a quarter, budget deficits by two-thirds. In eight of the past ten years, according to the World Bank, sub-Saharan growth has been faster than East Asia’s (though that does include Japan).

Even after revising downward its 2012 forecast because of a slowdown in the northern hemisphere, the IMF still expects sub-Saharan Africa’s economies to expand by 5.75% next year. Several big countries are likely to hit growth rates of 10%. The World Bank—not known for boosterism—said in a report this year that “Africa could be on the brink of an economic take-off, much like China was 30 years ago and India 20 years ago,” though its officials think major poverty reduction will require higher growth than today’s—a long-term average of 7% or more.

There is another point of comparison with Asia: demography. Africa’s population is set to double, from 1 billion to 2 billion, over the next 40 years. As Africa’s population grows in size, it will also alter in shape. The median age is now 20, compared with 30 in Asia and 40 in Europe. With fertility rates dropping, that median will rise as today’s mass of young people moves into its most productive years. The ratio of people of working age to those younger and older—the dependency ratio—will improve. This “demographic dividend” was crucial to the growth of East Asian economies a generation ago. It offers a huge opportunity to Africa today.

Seen through a bullish eye, this reinforces exuberant talk of “lion economies” analogous to the Asian tigers. But there are caveats. For one thing, in Africa, perhaps even more so than in Asia, wildly different realities can exist side by side. Averaging out failed states and phenomenal success stories is of limited value. The experience of the leaders is an unreliable guide to what will become of the laggards. For another, these are early days, and there have been false dawns before. Those of bearish mind will ask whether the lions can match the tigers for stamina. Will Africa continue to rise? Or is this merely a strong upswing in a boom-bust cycle that will inevitably come tumbling back down?

More than diamond geezers

Previous African growth spurts undoubtedly owed a lot to commodity prices (see chart 1). After all, Africa has about half the world’s gold reserves and a third of its diamonds, not to mention copper, coltan and all sorts of other minerals and metals. In the 1960s revenues from mining paid for roads, palaces and skyscrapers. When markets slumped in the 1980s the money dried up. The skylines of Johannesburg, Nairobi and Lagos are still littered with high-rise flotsam from the high-water marks of previous booms.

Recently revenues from selling oil and metals have helped to fill treasuries, create jobs and feed an appetite for luxury. In gem-rich Angola, high-grade diamonds are reimported after being cut in Europe to adorn the fingers of local minerals magnates and their molls.

Overall, though, only about a third of Africa’s recent growth is due to commodities. West and southern Africa are the chief beneficiaries. Equatorial Guinea gets most of its revenues from oil; Zambia gets half its GDP from copper. When commodity prices soften or tumble such countries will undoubtedly suffer. But it is east Africa, with little oil and only a sprinkling of minerals, that boasts the fastest-expanding regional economy on the continent, and there are outposts of similar non-resource-based growth elsewhere, such as Burkina Faso. “Everything is growing, not just commodities,” says Mo Ibrahim, a Sudanese mobile-phone mogul who is arguably Africa’s most successful entrepreneur.

When the world economy—and with it commodity prices—tanked in 2008, African growth rates barely budged. “Africa has great resilience,” says Mthuli Ncube, chief economist of the African Development Bank. “A structural change has taken place.”

A long-term decline in commodity prices would undoubtedly hurt. But commodity-led growth on the continent is not as reversible as it used to be. For one thing, African governments have invested more wisely this time round, notably in infrastructure. In much of the continent roads are still dire. But there are more decent ones than there used to be, and each new length of tarmac will boost the productivity of the people it serves long after the cashflow that paid for it dries up. For another, Africa’s commodities now have a wider range of buyers. A generation ago Brazil, Russia, India and China accounted for just 1% of African trade. Today they make up 20%, and by 2030 the rate is expected to be 50%. If China and India continue to grow Africa probably will too.

More jaw-jaw, less war-war

What’s more, many foreign participants in the African commodity trade have become less short-termist. They are likely to stick around after they finish mining; Chinese workers, of whom there are tens of thousands in Africa, have shown a propensity to morph into local entrepreneurs. A Cantonese construction company in Angola recently set up its own manufacturing arm to produce equipment that is difficult to import. Few Western competitors would do the same (though many of their colonial forebears did).

Commodity growth may be more assured than it used to be. But two big drivers of Africa’s growth would still be there even if the continent held not a barrel of oil nor an ounce of gold. One is the application of technology. Mobile phones have penetrated deep into the bush. More than 600m Africans have one; perhaps 10% of those have access to mobile-internet services. The phones make boons like savings accounts and information on crop prices ever more available.

Technology is also aiding health care. The World Bank says malaria takes $12 billion out of Africa’s GDP every year. But thanks to more and better bed nets, death rates have fallen by 20%. Foreign investors in countries with high HIV-infection rates complain about expensively trained workers dying in their 30s and 40s, but the incidence of new infection is dropping in much of the continent, and many more people are receiving effective treatment.

The second big non-commodity driver is political stability. The Africa of a generation ago was a sad place. The blight of apartheid isolated its largest economy, South Africa. Only seven out of more than 50 countries held frequent elections. America and the Soviet Union conducted proxy wars. Capital was scarce and macroeconomic management erratic. Lives were cut short by bullets and machetes.

Africa is still not entirely peaceful and democratic. But it has made huge strides. The dead hand of the Soviet Union is gone; countries such as Mozambique and Ethiopia have given up on Marxism. The dictators, such as Congo’s leopard-skin-fez-wearing Mobutu Sese Seko, that superpowers once propped up have fallen. Civil wars like the one which crippled Angola have mostly ended. Two out of three African countries now hold elections, though they are not always free and fair. Congo held one on November 28th.

Friends and neighbours

Even if many of the world’s most inept states can still be found between the Sahara and Kalahari deserts, governance has improved markedly in many places. Regulatory reforms have partially unshackled markets. A string of privatisations (more than 100 in Nigeria alone) has reduced the role of the state in many countries. In Nigeria, Africa’s biggest resource economy, the much-expanded service sector, if taken together with agriculture, now almost matches oil output.

Trade barriers have been reduced, at least a bit, and despite the dearth of good roads, regional trade—long an African weakness—is picking up. By some measures, intra-African trade has gone from 6% to 13% of the total volume. Some economists think the post-apartheid reintegration of South Africa on its own has provided an extra 1% in annual GDP growth for the continent, and will continue to do so for some time. It is now the biggest source of foreign investment for other countries south of the Sahara.

Somewhat belatedly, Africans are taking an interest in each other. Flight connections are improving, even if an Arab city, Dubai, is still the best hub for African travellers. Blocks of African economies have taken steps towards integration. The East African Community, which launched a common market in 2010, is doing well; the Economic Community of West African States less so. The Southern African Development Community has made the movement of goods and people across borders much easier. That said, barriers remain, and the economy suffers as a result. Africans pay twice as much for washing powder as consumers in Asia, where trade and transport are easier and cheaper.

As in Asia a generation ago, relatively small increases in capital can produce large productivity gains. When, after decades of capital starvation, outside investors started to take that disproportionate return seriously, they helped Asia blossom. Now some of those investors are eyeing Africa. In financial centres such as London barely a week goes by without an Africa investor conference. Private-equity firms that a decade ago barely knew sub-Saharan Africa existed raised $1.5 billion for projects on the continent last year. In 2010 total foreign direct investment was more than $55 billion—five times what it was a decade earlier, and much more than Africa receives in aid (see chart 2).

Foreign investors are no longer just interested in oil wells and mines. They are moving on to medium-sized bets on consumer goods. The number of projects—for example by retail chains such as Britain’s Marks & Spencer—has doubled in the past three years. Despite the boom in mining, the share of total investment going into extractive activities has shrunk by 13%. That said, the riches are far from evenly spread: three-quarters of all investments are in just ten big countries.

The increased interest from outsiders that has been triggered by Africa’s political and technological changes is not, though, the heart of the story. Economic change has made life more rewarding for Africans themselves. They have more opportunities to start businesses and get ahead than they have enjoyed in living memory, and governments are showing some willingness to get out of their way. According to the World Bank’s annual ranking of commercial practices, 36 out of 46 African governments made things easier for business in the past year.

Talking to the future

No end to worries

That said, most African countries are still clustered near the bottom of the table. In all sorts of ways African governments need to run their countries more efficiently, more accountably and less intrusively. They also need to offer much better schooling, an area in which Africa woefully lags behind Asia. African businessmen constantly complain about the shortage of skills. Hiring qualified staff can be prohibitively expensive. The return of skilled exiles has helped in some newly peaceful countries, but often foreigners are needed, usually other Africans. Without better education, Africa cannot hope to emulate the Asian miracle.

Africa’s demographic dividend, too, is far from guaranteed. A growing population and a bulge of working-age citizens proved a blessing in Asia. But population growth always has its costs. All those extra people must be fed, educated and given opportunities. If illiberal policies obstruct growth and discourage firms from hiring, Africa’s extra millions may soon be jobless and disgruntled. Some may even take up arms—a sure recipe for disaster, both human and economic.

An abundance of young people is like gearing on a balance sheet: it makes good situations better and bad ones worse. It is worrying that some of Africa’s fastest-growing populations are in economies not performing well at the moment; and fertility rates are not declining as uniformly, or as swiftly, as they did in Asia.

Africa’s extra people are flocking to cities. Some 40% of Africans are city dwellers now, up from 30% a generation ago. By 2025 the number is likely to be 50%. In Asia the rate is currently 52%. This is usually a good thing. Productivity is higher in cities. Transport costs are lower and markets are busier when people live close to each other. In bad times, the tight ethnic jumble of the city can be a powder keg. That said, Africa’s worst wars, such as those in Congo, Rwanda, Sudan and Somalia, have been fought in countries where most people are peasants or livestock herders.

Extra mouths will need to be fed. There is scope for this. Though Africa is now a net food importer, it has 60% of the world’s uncultivated arable land. It produces less per person now than in 1960. Africa’s land is often hard to farm, with large year on year variations in climate (a problem likely to get worse as the Earth heats up). Farmers lack access to capital for fertiliser and irrigation. More roads and storage depots are also needed; much of the harvest rots before it gets to market. And land ownership often raises thorny issues about who belongs to a place and who does not.

Agriculture is a long-term worry. A shorter term concern is how to deal with a coming slowdown and recession in the north. Investors fleeing risky assets in Europe are unlikely to put their cash into Africa. More likely they will pull back some of the money they have already invested there. The signs are that this is already happening. Bankers say the deal flow is slowing. But many remain generally bullish on Africa, convinced that its growth potential will reward patient investors and eventually lure back fickle ones.

Africa’s growth is now underpinned by a permanent shift in expectations. In many African countries people have at last started to see themselves as citizens, with the rights that citizenship brings. Greater political awareness makes it harder for incompetent despots to hold on to power, as north Africa has discovered. Bastions of the continent’s past—destitute, violent and isolated—are becoming exceptions.

Africa is not the next China. It provides only a tiny fraction of world output—2.5% at purchasing-power parity. It is as yet not even a good bet for retail investors, given the dearth of stockmarkets. Mr Dangote’s $10 billion undeniably makes him a big fish, but the Dangote Group accounts for a quarter of Nigeria’s stockmarket by value: it is a small and rather illiquid pond. Nonetheless, Africa’s boom will continue to benefit Africans, serving the billion as well as the billionaires. That is no small feat.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...